Chelsea for October 20

Uncategorized Add comments

In going through this week’s reading, it occurred to me that there is another “multitude” of Whitman’s that we have only briefly touched on that is quite worth discussing – Whitman as a father figure.  Particularly throughout the Calder essay, where the tender Whitman we’ve spoken of seems at his best, Whitman’s envy and revere of mothers and shame of the lack of responsibility in fathers show a side of Whitman that seems under-addressed, particularly with his interactions with soldiers during the war.  These thoughts and position carry over into Whitman’s relationships with the boys he writes of in Drum-Taps and his ability to look at them as a father might, makes him an ideal candidate to care for them.

In Calder’s essay, she explains that though Whitman did not think marriage was in the cards for his life and though he did not envy husbands their wives, he did envy their ability to have children.  She even quotes Whitman as saying to a little girl that he wished he knew her when she chirps, “I know you.”  This image of Whitman as an affectionate father is much more appealing to me than Whitman “the stalker” or Whitman “the creeper” as our class has so affectionately named him.  His desire (though he is seemingly unable) to have children, mobilizes him into “adopting” the soldiers as his own sons.  His conversation with the little girl is reminiscent of “The Wound-Dresser” when he writes, “One turns to me his appealing eyes—poor boy! I never knew you, / Yet I think I could not refuse this moment to die for you, if that would save you” (444). 

 Throughout Drum-Taps, Whitman also refers to the soldiers as “sons” or “boys” as a father might to his child; he also does this in his letters to Peter Doyle, despite the two’s obvious intimate relationship.  Though this may be viewed as merely an age difference marker, the tenderness in which he refers to the soldiers suggests more of a relationship between him and them.  It is almost as if Whitman, having no children of his own, asserts himself as the father of the American people, thus adding to his lengthy list of titles.  As Calder points out, Whitman often called “the institution of father a failure” (198) and posited this as the reason many boys were driven to enlist.  This is yet another area in which Whitman’s desire to mend America’s mistakes manifests itself though Whitman offering himself as a means by which to fix the problem – an honorable pursuit, I think.

 Drum-Taps has ironically given me a better picture of Whitman, the man.  When he stops talking about being the savior of the nation, it seems he is better at actually being it.  Despite his more romantic relationships, it is more rewarding to view Whitman as a father rather than a lusty old man taking advantage of invalid soldiers.  Viewing him this way allows Whitman to be seen as a man who truly wanted to rekindle and reunite the nation through tender affection and love, the kind of unconditional love a parent would give a child.

2 Responses to “Chelsea for October 20”

  1. erinm Says:
    Avatar of erinm


    This is an awesome and interesting post! Thanks for sharing.

  2. abcwhitman Says:
    Avatar of abcwhitman

    As much as we joke about Whitman being a creeper and, lets be honest, some times he is, but this week’s readings (especially Calder’s) really illuminated Walt Whitman as a sweet, caring, tender man. A man who is mistaken for Santa Claus cannot possibly be cold-hearted. Whitman filled his desire of paternal fatherhood with the young soldiers he cared for. We can even see his father-like qualities in his poetry. With every little didactic moment, his nuggets of wisdom, Whitman becomes a father figure to the reader. We recognize his blatant didacticism, but it never seems pretentious. We just smile to ourselves because Walt is charming– Good Ol’ Uncle Walt.

    Lets not overlook, however, that there were certain soldiers, Tom Sawyer for instance, that Whitman did not have fatherly-feelings towards. But despite his crushes / infatuations with specific soldiers, that does not mean Walt did not have fatherly and comrade-ish feelings towards the soldiers as a whole. It would foolish to not recognize both of these aspects of Whitman.

Leave a Reply

Wordpress Themes by Natty WP.
Images by koop viagra desEXign.
Skip to toolbar